King Opens Parliament: Between Tradition and Contemporary Political Reality

"Beautiful symbols are not enough: Malaysia wants a Parliament that acts, not just a political performance."

KUALA LUMPUR : Today, His Majesty the Yang di-Pertuan Agong officially opened the Parliamentary session, marking the start of a new term for both the Dewan Rakyat and Dewan Negara. As usual, the ceremony was full of pomp, protocol, and symbolism, but behind the grandeur, a pressing question arises: does this annual event truly reflect the aspirations of the people, or is it merely a carefully staged political spectacle?

In his royal address, the King urged all members of Parliament to prioritize national interests, foster unity, and avoid personal or party-centered agendas. Yet for critics, this message is largely “symbolic,” as Malaysia’s political reality is often dominated by internal disputes, party conflicts, and populist rhetoric that does little to solve real problems facing citizens.

Political observers note that while the opening ceremony showcases formal protocol and colorful pageantry, it does not guarantee transparency, effectiveness, or political accountability. “People want action, not symbols. Parliament may look impressive in photos and media coverage, but out there, issues like the cost of living, unemployment, and education continue to press on society,” said one political analyst.

This year’s opening also drew attention because some political parties appear determined to recycle ideological divisions, even as the King emphasizes unity. For many critics, this highlights a growing gap between the monarchy’s traditional role and the contentious reality of politics, where parties focus more on identity, power, and short-term survival than on public welfare.

Social media reactions have also questioned Parliament’s actual function. Many ask whether the Dewan Rakyat truly serves as a productive space for debate, or if it has become a stage for dramatic rhetoric. This phenomenon raises a serious concern: are Malaysians genuinely benefiting from the new parliamentary term, or are they merely passive spectators in a “democracy performance”?

Yet some argue that the ceremony is important as a symbol of continuity and institutional stability, showing that Malaysia’s democratic processes remain intact despite internal political tensions and public dissatisfaction. Symbols alone, however, are not enough — critics stress that concrete action, effective legislation, and accountable leadership are key to restoring public trust.

With this new parliamentary term underway, all eyes are now on whether lawmakers will heed the King’s advice. Will they focus on national priorities like the economy, healthcare, education, and infrastructure development, or will they continue recycling old rhetoric and political disputes that divide the nation? The answer will determine whether today’s opening becomes a true turning point for change or remains a ceremonial ritual — beautiful in form, but hollow in substance.