Why Zahid prima facie case was ignored? Lawyers challenge AGC

Legal fraternity presses AGC on rationale for setting aside Zahid prima facie case

Kuala Lumpur - Lawyers from various quarters are calling on the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) to provide a clear explanation for its decision to classify the Yayasan Akalbudi case against Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi as “no further action” (NFA).

The calls follow widespread concern within the legal fraternity, particularly in light of a High Court ruling which had earlier found that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against Zahid. The ruling related to all 47 charges brought against him, involving allegations of criminal breach of trust, corruption and money laundering.

Critics argue that the NFA decision raises serious questions about prosecutorial consistency and transparency, given that the court had determined there was sufficient evidence for Zahid to be called to enter his defence. They say the AGC should clarify the legal basis and considerations that led to the reversal, especially in a case involving a senior public office holder.

Several lawyers have stressed that while the Attorney General has broad prosecutorial discretion under the Federal Constitution, such discretion must be exercised in a manner that upholds public confidence in the administration of justice. They warn that the absence of a detailed explanation could fuel public perception of selective prosecution or unequal application of the law.

The AGC has yet to issue a detailed public statement outlining the reasons behind the NFA decision in the Yayasan Akalbudi case, which has drawn sustained public and legal scrutiny due to its high-profile nature and the gravity of the charges involved.